نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
The present study adopts an analytical–critical approach to examine the philosophical foundations of hierarchical governance in the thought of Max Weber. The primary objective of the research is to investigate the ontological, epistemological, axiological and methodological foundations of this model of governance and to critically evaluate them in relation to efficiency, legitimacy, and indigenous contexts. The central question of the study is: What are the philosophical foundations of hierarchical governance, and what critiques can be raised against them? The research method is based on philosophical content analysis, drawing upon the works of Max Weber as well as other classical and contemporary theorists to identify and evaluate the various philosophical dimensions of this model. The findings of the study indicate that, at the ontological level, hierarchical governance is grounded in legal authority, rational–legal order, and the process of social rationalization. At the anthropological level, the emphasis on Protestant ethics and the ethics of individual responsibility gives rise to instrumental rationality and the “iron cage” of bureaucracy. At the epistemological level, this model of governance relies on an objectivist approach, while its methodology is grounded in positivism and causal explanation. Finally, at the axiological level, this model of governance emphasizes procedural justice and the primacy of public interests. The critiques directed at these foundations emerge on two levels: first, intra-paradigmatic critiques, which point to the consequences of instrumental rationality, depersonalization, institutional rigidity, and neglect of substantive justice; and second, extra-paradigmatic critiques, particularly from the perspective of Islamic governance, which regard the secular, anthropocentric, and value-neutral nature of these foundations as incompatible with the ethical, spiritual, and sacred ends of religious societies. The conclusion of the study indicates that although bureaucracy, as a rational mode of governing modern societies, has succeeded in ensuring administrative efficiency and institutional order, it has failed to realize ultimate justice, social responsibility, and human dignity due to its reduction of human beings and society to calculable and controllable units. Accordingly, the study suggests that designing alternative models of governance through the integration of bureaucratic efficiency with indigenous ethical, cultural, and spiritual values is an unavoidable necessity for overcoming the limitations of this paradigm and responding to the needs of contemporary societies.
کلیدواژهها English
